We are observing the campaigns together with the community, yes. But I think it’s important to wait for the end of the campaigns to draw conclusions.
All tasks of each agency are shared in the thread. So it is possible to easily map the results of the campaigns with the agencies.
Regarding the bots, my personal interpretation is that they are used to increase the reach of the posts via the Twitter algorithm. The more likes, reposts and comments, the more Twitter will distribute the content to other real users. So while I would not attribute those comments as real or valuable engagement, it is also important to not dismiss their indirect value via secondary effects.
Finally I would also add that it’s important to keep the right expectations while evaluating the campaigns. Each agency so far is executing based on the first batch of the payment ($5-6k), which is really a small amount. So the results and value they create should be rated relative to the low cost. If the community wants to see major crypto influencers talk about Hydra, I think that would require a significantly increased budget. Something that can be considered/proposed in the future.
What’s more important than the immediate impact is to validate the framework and use it as a self-improving tool. Whether the first months yield positive returns or not, the collective experience and insights we as the community gather from them will stay with us for the long term. Campaigns can be modified based on the learnings and guidlines can be formulated for future iterations.